Polymorphism in flower colour may be maintained either by pollinator preferences or by environmental fluctuations. Tang and Huan examine gynoecium colour polymorphism in an emergent, aquatic monocot Butomus umbellatus and find that the major pollinator groups do not discriminate between the pink and white morphs. Instead, the plants differ in their tolerance to water level, thus demonstrating that flower colour polymorphism can be maintained by temporal or spatial heterogeneity of the environment
You may also like
Spatial distribution of genetic variation in the flower colour polymorphic Iris lutescens
Flower colour polymorphism in plants had been used as a classic model for understanding the importance of neutral processes versus natural selection in population differentiation. Iris lutescens (Iridaceae) is a...
Functional pollinators and morph ratio in Narcissus
Heterostyly and related style polymorphisms are good model systems to evaluate the importance of functional pollinators in the maintenance of population variability. Santos-Gally et al. study floral traits in style...
Style polymorphism in Nivenia (Iridaceae)
Heterostyly is widely distributed among the angiosperms, but detailed studies are limited to few taxonomic groups. Sánchez et al. (pp. 321–331) ascertain the presence of different stigma height polymorphisms among...
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
Read this in your language
The Week in Botany
On Monday mornings we send out a newsletter of the links that have been catching the attention of our readers on Twitter and beyond. You can sign up to receive it below.
1 comment