
The communication of science (and particularly discussion thereof and thereon, which often takes the form of post-publication review) has many opportunities in this electronic age. One such outlet is the plethora of social networking fora. In this regard Iβm happy to put in a plug for the Annals of Botanyβs own ground-breaking work, noticeably this very blog you are currently reading, which is cared for by βthe two Alansβ β Alun Salt, βcreative geniusβ and the blogβs web developer, and Alan Cann, Internet Consulting Editor for Annals of Botany. But rather than use my words, let me quote anotherβs, who was commenting upon Cannβs talk at the recent European Association of Science Editors (EASE) conference in Tallinn (Estonia), βAlan goes on to describe the Annals of Botany own social media strategy. Its explicitly low-cost approach has succeeded in extending the reach of the journal through using blogs as hubs for distributing content via RSS, Twitter and Facebook while leveraging emerging tools like Flipboard to facilitate content discovery on new platforms such as tablet computers. By doing all this Annals of Botany is succeeding in addressing new audiences and new demographic groupsβ. A video of Alanβs presentation can be seen at that same URL, and βis a real masterclass in how academic publishers can make really creative use of social mediaβ. So, is this an example of the βHeineken effectβΒ β with the journal reaching the parts other journals cannot reach? Maybe. In any event, blogging is clearly seen as a good thing as PLoS Biology has now started its own, PLoS Biologue. Where the Annals leads, others surely follow. Cheers, Alan and Alun!
Very kind Nigel. In fact, I was asked to take this talk on tour, and I’ve just returned from giving a version to the ISAJE meeting in Lisbon: http://www.parint.org/isajewebsite/meetings2012.htm
and next month it’s off to the Eurosurveillance meeting in Edinburgh: http://www.eurosurveillance.org
AoB is indeed leading the way π