Image: Neil Harris, University of Alberta/Wikimedia Commons.
Home » Brachypodium is NOT Arabidopsis(!)

Brachypodium is NOT Arabidopsis(!)

Interactions between plant hormones ethylene and auxin in roots of the monocot Brachypodium distachyon differ to those in roots of the dicot Arabidopsis.

Image: Neil Harris, University of Alberta/Wikimedia Commons.
Image: Neil Harris, University of Alberta/Wikimedia Commons.

Yes, Arabidopsis is a model organism, but for what exactly? Many would like us to believe that it is a model for all things botanical, i.e. plants. However, with those organisms newly defined as ‘photosynthetic eukaryotic organisms, including algae and possibly cyanobacteria’, that is a truly tall order for such a slight specimen! And arguably an extreme point of view (although entirely understandable if one’s past, present and future employment is tied to research grants using this beast). However, and at the other end of that spectrum of opinion, there are those who espouse the view that arabidopsis is truly only a model for, well, other arabidopses. Adding to the debate, David Pacheco-Villalobos et al. reveal that interactions between the plant hormones ethylene and auxin in roots of the monocot Brachypodium distachyon (‘another’ model plant) differ to those in roots of the dicot Arabidopsis.

Whereas lowered levels of ethylene in Arabidopsis can cause decreases in another hormone – auxin – and thus result in shorter roots, in Brachypodium decreases in ethylene lead to elevated levels of auxin and longer roots(!). The latter’s ‘inverted regulatory relation between the two hormones’ points to ‘a complex homeostatic crosstalk between auxin and ethylene in Brachypodium roots, which is fundamentally different from Arabidopsis and might be conserved in other monocotyledons’. So, and as those scientists sagely state, ‘Observations gained from model organisms are essential, yet it remains unclear to which degree they are applicable to distant relatives’. And, further complicating the ethylene story – if such was needed at this stage – ‘Scientists identify thousands of plant genes activated by ethylene gas’. Examining transcriptional response to ethylene, Katherine Chang et al. have shown that this gaseous plant hormone is involved in an extensive network of cross-regulation with many other plant hormones centred around EIN3, a transcription factor that acts as the ‘master regulator’ of the ethylene signalling pathway.

Although this work was performed in arabidopsis, EIN3 orthologs exist in many other plants, so this study is anticipated to have broader relevance to… poplar, soybean, rice, maize, moss and multicellular algae.

Updated Oct 4, as ethylene and auxin were transposed in the sentence ‘Whereas lowered levels of…’.

Nigel Chaffey

I am a Botanist and former Senior Lecturer in Botany at Bath Spa University (Bath, near Bristol, UK). As News Editor for the Annals of Botany I contributed the monthly Plant Cuttings column to that august international phytological organ for almost 10 years. I am now a freelance plant science communicator and Visiting Research Fellow at Bath Spa University. I also continue to share my Cuttingsesque items - and appraisals of books with a plant focus - with a plant-curious audience at Botany One. In that guise my main goal is to inform (hopefully, in an educational, and entertaining way) others about plants and plant-people interactions, and thereby improve humankind's botanical literacy. I'm happy to be contacted to discuss potential writing - or talking - projects and opportunities.
[ORCID: 0000-0002-4231-9082]

1 comment

  • So the concept that mice are not people, which has been driven home in a multitude of papers, hasn’t carried over to the botanists and their mouse-ear cress. You would think… sheesh.

Read this in your language

The Week in Botany

On Monday mornings we send out a newsletter of the links that have been catching the attention of our readers on Twitter and beyond. You can sign up to receive it below.

@BotanyOne on Mastodon

Loading Mastodon feed...