Home » 369,400…and counting(!)

369,400…and counting(!)

Being an avid supporter of the importance of plants (I do hope that’s come over quite strongly in my various blog items..?), I’m always keen to share with my students [well, any- and everybody really…] how many plant species there are. For several years the best – i.e. biggest! – number I’d found was 352,000 species of flowering plants. Although officially an estimate, it’s quite impressive. However, the most up-to-date tally is 369,400 angiosperm species (RBG Kew (2016) The State of the World’s Plants Report – 2016).* But, and regardless of how many there are** , why should we be interested in all – or indeed any – plants anyway?

By Rkitko – cobbled together by User:Rkitko from images available on Wikimedia Commons., GFDL,

Well, directly (e.g. as food for humans) or indirectly (as food for the animals whose flesh and/or other products we humans eat), plants are essential to keeping people alive. But they contribute so much more than that. That same Kew Report states that 31,128*** plant species currently have documented uses, over half (19,192) of which are used ‘socially’ or medicinally, more than a third have a materials use, and 9,187 are exploited as food for humans and other animals.**** All of that’s on the positive side for plants.

On the negative side, 21 % of global plant species are currently threatened with extinction according to IUCN Red list criteria, i.e. are in the Vulnerable, Endangered, or Critically Endangered categories. And – maybe surprisingly? – almost a third of that risk is because of conversion of land for agriculture. Which basically means that, if we are to have any chance of studying the plant diversity that exists (or is estimated so to do), we need to work to conserve the habitats wherein plants live, i.e. look after this planet a whole lot better than we’re doing at present! Now there’s a novel notion.

There’s a lot more in the Kew Report than those items I’ve cherry-picked above (but best to do so whilst there are still cherries left to pick…), so do download your own copy – it’s free – and find your own reasons to be cheerful, or scare yourself to sleep with its somewhat depressing statistics.

*Or 390,900 vascular plants (which includes angiosperms, gymnosperms, ferns and fern-allies, but excludes the bryophytes amongst the Kingdom Plantae). However, if that’s too many species and too much information, remember that, according to Dr Markus Eichhorn, forest ecologist at The University of Nottingham (UK), all of this bewildering phytobiodiversity can be reduced to only four kinds of plants: Plants you can eat, Plants you can kill people with, Plants you can use to get high, and The rest.

**And don’t forget, that this is still many fewer than the 386,500 species of beetles on the planet (Slipinski et al.)! Now, it may be the case that ‘the Creator has an inordinate fondness for these insects’ (a quote attributed to JBS Haldane – British geneticist, biochemist, professor and writer) over plants because of the multilegged animals’ numerical taxonomic superiority. However, might it not be the case that God, in her infinite wisdom, actually created many more plant species than beetles but chose to hide them in places so that we might not discover all of those extremely useful organisms until we had learnt to look after them..? If that’s the case, apparently the most likely hiding places are Brazil, Australia, and China. However, if there are really 450,000 flowering plant species – as Stuart Pimm and Lucas Joppa suggest – it’s Plants 1: Beetles 0… [Ed. – all of this numerical nonsense is trumped by the estimated 1 trillion (i.e. 1012) species of microbes on the planet anyway. So, all bets are now off!]

***Interestingly, if you add up the number of species in each of the 10 categories that are listed, you get a total of 59,029, which gives an indication of how many plants have multiple uses. Somewhat irritatingly, though, I couldn’t find a list – or reference to a source that contains the list – of all of those (or indeed any of them by name!) species and what they are used for…

****I.e. plants keep us healthy and cheerful, clothed, and fed. Which trio of testamentary tracheophyte truths is reminiscent of the three words ‘Miserable’, ‘Naked’, and ‘Hungry’ that Prof. Armstrong displays on the ‘board’ to start his classes in economic botany, and which is what us humans would be without plants.

Nigel Chaffey

I am a Botanist and former Senior Lecturer in Botany at Bath Spa University (Bath, near Bristol, UK). As News Editor for the Annals of Botany I contributed the monthly Plant Cuttings column to that international plant science journal for almost 10 years. As a freelance plant science communicator I continue to share my Cuttingsesque items - and appraisals of books with a plant focus - with a plant-curious audience at Plant Cuttings [] (and formerly at Botany One []). In that guise my main goal is to inform (hopefully, in an educational, and entertaining way) others about plants and plant-people interactions, and thereby improve humankind's botanical literacy. I'm happy to be contacted to discuss potential writing - or talking - projects and opportunities.
[ORCID: 0000-0002-4231-9082]

Read this in your language

The Week in Botany

On Monday mornings we send out a newsletter of the links that have been catching the attention of our readers on Twitter and beyond. You can sign up to receive it below.

@BotanyOne on Mastodon

Loading Mastodon feed...