Scots Pine
Home » What sets apart individual trees that died versus trees that survived an extreme drought?

What sets apart individual trees that died versus trees that survived an extreme drought?

Plant responses to drought involve multiple interacting traits and processes, which complicates predictions about which plants will die and which will survive. Species are often characterized by species-specific strategies that enable them to cope with drought. However, great within-species variation exists due to dynamic individual-level adjustments made to maximize carbon gain and reduce water loss during drought.

Scots Pine
Scots Pine (Pinus sylvestris). Photo: Jim Champion / Flickr.

Garcia-Forner et al. (2016) investigated individual drought responses by exposing 5 year old Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) saplings to extreme drought for 2.5 months in a greenhouse. They monitored morphological and ecophysiological variables before, during, and after the drought to compare characteristics of dead and surviving trees and determine why some individuals die and others survive.

The authors found that time to death varied by over 3 months despite growing individuals of the same species in the same environment. They found that surviving trees had greater access to water (greater below:above mass ratios) and greater C assimilation (greater photosynthesis) despite also greater water loss (greater stomatal conductance) before and during drought compared to trees that died. Trees that survived also had greater sugar (a type of non-structural carbohydrate, NSC) levels before and during drought relative to trees that died.

The results showed that maintaining open stomata for C gain despite the loss of water through stomata allowed surviving trees to invest more C to greater root growth necessary to maintain hydraulic function. The results also suggest that stored sugars and NSCs may enhance survival during drought. This study is particularly novel because it demonstrated that at the individual level, C availability may be as important as stomatal regulation of water loss for surviving extreme drought.

Danielle Marias

PhD student at Oregon State University studying heat and drought stress in all sorts of plants. Telemark skier, trail runner, breakfast enthusiast, dog lover.


  • Were the trees grown in pots and then allowed to dry until unable to recover? If some trees (called A) had a smaller total leaf surface yet greater stomatal conductance than other trees, with larger LA and smaller conductance (called B) then A would have a slower rate of total water loss than B, and consequently would dry the soil more slowly. Trees A would be able to maintain stomatal opening for a longer period than B, allowing greater photosynthesis, accumulation of sugars etc. Trees A would then appear to be more “drought resistant” than trees B but in fact they would not be. All “drought resistance” would depend on the relative size (LA) of the trees at the start of the experiment..

  • No, they were acclimated for one year into the ground and subjected there to water exclusion. The example you used was not the case in our experiment. The resistant trees, the ones that maintained stomatal opening for longer, were also the ones with higher total leaf area at tree level at the beginning of the experiment. Thus, resistant trees showed higher rates of water loss at tree level at the same time that allowed higher C uptake.

Read this in your language

The Week in Botany

On Monday mornings we send out a newsletter of the links that have been catching the attention of our readers on Twitter and beyond. You can sign up to receive it below.

@BotanyOne on Mastodon

Loading Mastodon feed...